[MeshModel] Add new relationship definitions #8271
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ananya Gautam <ananyagautam0607@gmail.com>
|
|
|
🚀 Preview for commit ccaae66 at: https://64bfa57719325c520c6195c4--meshery-docs-preview.netlify.app |
| @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MUzairS15, please confirm whether these new relationship definitions will be automatically accounted for on Meshery Server boot. If they will, then @Boombag0607, further scrutiny is required. Define manual tests and show the outputs of your results; e.g.
❌ A ConfigMap of one Kubernetes version (e.g. v1.25.0) can relate to a Service within a different Kubernetes version (e.g. v1.27.1).
✅ A ConfigMap of one Kubernetes version (e.g. v1.25.0) can relate to a Service within a different Kubernetes version (e.g. v1.25.0).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@leecalcote I'll take a look if these definitions will sit well. Or we can focus on getting the MeshModal relationship doc approved first, then code them in the server.
|
@Boombag0607 Let's discuss this on the Meshery Dev call. Please add this as an agenda item in the meeting minutes if you would. :) |
|
merge conflict |
|
Closing this. |
Notes for Reviewers
This PR adds Controller and Configurational peer relationship definitions.
Signed commits