We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As mentioned on the tin.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/tree/gst-libs/gst/gl/meson.build?id=980ddfdfb740107ce8d9db3f8679d235af757412#n366
Which results in:
Command line: ccache cc /tmp/tmp3s718w9b/testfile.c -O0 -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c -o /tmp/tmp3s718w9b/output.obj Code: void f (void) {} Compiler stdout: Compiler stderr:
We either need to add support for the prefix kwarg or error out on its use in cc.compiles().
GStreamer bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787964
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, looks like we don't use the @permittedKwargs decorator for compiler methods.
@permittedKwargs
Sorry, something went wrong.
Is there a consensus on whether cc.compiles() should support prefix: or not?
cc.compiles()
prefix:
No, but I guess we should add it just for consistency? It would make the reference manual simpler too.
We should decide if we want a prefix: kwarg for cc.compiles() or not.
If not, we can close this bug, because we do get warnings now. If yes, we should retitle.
meson: fix invalid keyword argument warnings
afc34b1
cc.compiles() doesn't have a 'prefix' argument (yet) and the prefix has already been prepended to the source code snippets. mesonbuild/meson#2364
No branches or pull requests
As mentioned on the tin.
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/tree/gst-libs/gst/gl/meson.build?id=980ddfdfb740107ce8d9db3f8679d235af757412#n366
Which results in:
We either need to add support for the prefix kwarg or error out on its use in cc.compiles().
GStreamer bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787964
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: