Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider canceling jdbc queries also on dbms side #41448

Open
lbrdnk opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider canceling jdbc queries also on dbms side #41448

lbrdnk opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@lbrdnk
Labels
.Backend Priority:P3 Cosmetic bugs, minor bugs with a clear workaround Querying/Processor .Team/QueryProcessor :hammer_and_wrench: Type:Bug Product defects

Comments

@lbrdnk
Copy link
Contributor

lbrdnk commented Apr 15, 2024

While working on #39018, I've found out that query in the reproduction is canceled on the FE. However, query is left to finish computation on the dbms side. I believe it should get terminated also there.

To reproduce, execute the query from the linked issue in the native editor and press abort. Use the queries from #39018 (comment) to confirm that query is still running on the dbms.

Apart from the Redshift, also other dbms should be tested.
@lbrdnk lbrdnk added Type:Bug Product defects Priority:P3 Cosmetic bugs, minor bugs with a clear workaround .Team/QueryProcessor :hammer_and_wrench: labels Apr 15, 2024
@lbrdnk lbrdnk self-assigned this Apr 15, 2024
@lbrdnk lbrdnk mentioned this issue Apr 16, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lbrdnk lbrdnk

Labels
.Backend Priority:P3 Cosmetic bugs, minor bugs with a clear workaround Querying/Processor .Team/QueryProcessor :hammer_and_wrench: Type:Bug Product defects
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ranquild @lbrdnk