Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ports/go: support buffer type #422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

iyear
Copy link
Contributor

@iyear iyear commented Apr 13, 2023

Description

Support buffer type for go port.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have added tests/screenshots (if any) that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have tested the tests implicated (if any) by my own code and they pass (make test or ctest -VV -R <test-name>).
  • If my change is significant or breaking, I have passed all tests with ./docker-compose.sh test &> output and attached the output.
  • I have tested my code with OPTION_BUILD_SANITIZER or ./docker-compose.sh test-sanitizer &> output and OPTION_TEST_MEMORYCHECK.
  • I have tested my code with OPTION_BUILD_THREAD_SANITIZER or ./docker-compose.sh test-thread-sanitizer &> output.
  • I have tested with Helgrind in case my code works with threading.
  • I have run make clang-format in order to format my code and my code follows the style guidelines.

If you are unclear about any of the above checks, have a look at our documentation here.

@viferga viferga merged commit 1168467 into metacall:develop Apr 13, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants