Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Zariski Topology is compact #4070

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024
Merged

The Zariski Topology is compact #4070

merged 22 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

tirix
Copy link
Contributor

@tirix tirix commented Jul 2, 2024

This adds proofs in 4 independent, but related directions:

  • the Zariski topology is compact (~zarcmp)
  • the preimage of a prime ideal by a ring homomorphism is a prime ideal (~rhmpreimaprmidl)
  • the property of being a prime element in a ring (~isrprm)
  • the zero ideal is a prime ideal if and only in an integral domain (~prmidl0)

I'm also adding some references to Grothendieck's Éléments de Géométrie Algébrique where relevant.
The next step would be to prove that the induced map on prime spectra is continuous.

Copy link
Contributor

@avekens avekens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very interesting results!
Would it be useful to have a definition for zero/trivial rings (maybe ZRing = { r e. Ring | ( # ` ( Base ` r ) ) = 1 })?

@avekens
Copy link
Contributor

avekens commented Jul 3, 2024

PS: ZRing is already existing, maybe 0Ring then...

@tirix
Copy link
Contributor Author

tirix commented Jul 3, 2024

Would it be useful to have a definition for zero/trivial rings (maybe 0Ring = { r e. Ring | ( # ` ( Base ` r ) ) = 1 })?

That would be a useful discussion to launch!

For zero rings, I've followed theorems in the main part: ~0ring, ~0ring01eq, ~0ringnnzr, which are all in the form ( ( R e. Ring /\ ( # ` B ) = 1 ) -> ...

If I were to choose a "class of zero rings", I'd say ( Ring \ NzRing ) is the best, because it is concise and does not need introducing a new definition. You actually have a few theorems with this form in your mathbox (~0ringdif and following)

mmset.raw.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@wlammen wlammen merged commit 656873c into metamath:develop Jul 5, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants