Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for document type "mise-en-pratique" #6

Closed
ronaldtse opened this issue Sep 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Add support for document type "mise-en-pratique" #6

ronaldtse opened this issue Sep 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

ronaldtse commented Sep 19, 2020

SI Brochure Appendix 2 contains a number of independent documents, seen here:
https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/mises-en-pratique/

Screen Shot 2020-09-19 at 6 28 02 PM

For each SI Unit, there is 1 document published as a Mise en pratique (MEP). Each MEP may be accompanied by additional guidance documents, but we consider those separately.

The sources for MEPs are provided here:
https://github.com/metanorma/bipm-si-brochure/tree/master/sources with the prefix mep-.

We need to unify a document layout for all MEPs and probably for all other "non-brochure" document types.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse changed the title Add support for document type "mise-en-pratique Add support for document type "mise-en-pratique" Sep 19, 2020
@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 19, 2020
@ronaldtse ronaldtse added this to Needs triage in Nick Nicholas via automation Sep 21, 2020
@ronaldtse ronaldtse moved this from Needs triage to High priority in Nick Nicholas Sep 21, 2020
@ronaldtse ronaldtse moved this from High priority to Current in Nick Nicholas Sep 21, 2020
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Oct 2, 2020

Not seeing any great idiosyncrasies in the documents, the versions online are straightforward Word documents with autoformatting.

@opoudjis opoudjis moved this from Current to On hold in Nick Nicholas Oct 2, 2020
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

Review of #5 is in effect review of these MEPs, so closing this ticket.

Nick Nicholas automation moved this from On hold to Closed Oct 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Nick Nicholas
  
Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants