Participant boilerplate comparison

[manuelfuenmayor]

As per #101 (comment)

@ronaldtse I see four documents on mn-samples-ieee-private:

For master-1-standard:

For master-2-standard:

For P2830_d1:

For 2830-2021:

The first one is a guide, and the other ones are standards.
Maybe the difference resides on the stage of the document?

[opoudjis]

We are allowing all the text to be user-supplied, other than the initial sentence of each participants subsection. @manuelfuenmayor @ronaldtse If we must make that be user-supplied as well, we will, but I'd really rather avoid that. Currently we are using the wording of master-1-standard

[ronaldtse]

If we must make that be user-supplied as well, we will, but I'd really rather avoid that.

I don't think we need to make it user-supplied. I will seek IEEE clarification.

[ronaldtse]

• The sentence in master-1-standard uses an identical pattern as 2830-2021, differing at the document type.
• P2830_d1 and 2830-2021 sentences differ where the word "IEEE" is substituted as "draft" for the draft.

I think these are the only two things we need to handle.