Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

orderline quick input follow-up #112

Closed
metas-lc opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

orderline quick input follow-up #112

metas-lc opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@metas-lc
Copy link

  • sales order:
  • batch entry - adding same product multiple times: once i get the product with HU (e.g. HU x 10), once with "No Handling Unit" NOK
  • add new - orderline takes the one from trading unit field (trading unit field is virtual pi by default - won't change, but i think this field should not be here) NOK
  • batch entry when is no HU for the product+bpartner - once with "No Handling Unit", one with "Virtual PI" NOK
  • purchase order:
  • batch entry - adding same product multiple times: you will always get the HU set on product (e.g. HU x 10), even if the HU is for another bpartner NOK
  • add new seems to work fine OK
  • not sure if wanted, but trading unit field is not shown in purchase order line NOK?
@teosarca teosarca changed the title orderline quick imput follow-up orderline quick input follow-up Jan 27, 2017
@teosarca
Copy link
Member

NOTE: you can see "No Handling Unit" in results because there is a packing item which is called like that, a different one from the actual "No Handling Unit".

See metasfresh/metasfresh#960

@metas-rc
Copy link
Member

Followup created: #128

@metas-rc
Copy link
Member

Results of IT 1:

Tested together with #111, same test cases:
https://github.com/metasfresh/metasfresh-documentation/blob/master/_tests_collection/Testcase_%23111.md OK

@metas-rc
Copy link
Member

Followup created: #129

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants