Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to include evaluation of MOS (model output statistics) #987

Closed
lewisblake opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Need to include evaluation of MOS (model output statistics) #987

lewisblake opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
CAMS2_83 Issues related to the CAMS2_83 contract enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@lewisblake
Copy link
Member

lewisblake commented Feb 2, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
CAMS2_83 requires evaluation of MOS

As @michaelgau said in the chat:
MOS are given at a certain number of stations. We are supposed to evaluate MOS and ENS against the same set of stations. That set includes all stations for which we have data in the MOS point cloud AND in the csv files from Meteo France. And as I told Charlie, for now I think we 'only' need to make FAIRMODE target plots. I.e. no weird plots or heat maps. So this can be a separate job. As somebody suggested a few weeks ago, it could even be made independently of pyaerocom, but let's discuss at our next meeting (in January) what is less work.

Describe the solution you would like to see

@michaelgau, can you please provide "A clear and concise description of what you want to happen." in addition to what is provided above. If the plan is to do this outside of pyaerocom, I will move the issue to the Model-Evaluation-Tools-Issues repository.

  • Would you be able to work on this solution yourself?
    No.
  • How can the Pyaerocom development team assist you?
    Discussing with CAMS2_83 team specific requirements about placing those requirements here.

Additional context
N/A

@lewisblake lewisblake added enhancement New feature or request CAMS2_83 Issues related to the CAMS2_83 contract labels Feb 2, 2024
@michaelgau
Copy link
Collaborator

michaelgau commented Feb 2, 2024

that's what I wanted to discuss at the meeting on Tuesday, but then 3 out of 4 invited guests got sick .. hope you're all fine again!

I had prepared a presentation for the meeting, but OK, I'll try to summarize here.

@lewisblake
Copy link
Member Author

Successfully got this data on Aeroval. More work needed, but a proof of concept was achieved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CAMS2_83 Issues related to the CAMS2_83 contract enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants