Skip to content

Minimalistic Dependency Injection - Or: what I got wrong about dependency injection. Done in Java based solely on the JSR 330 annotations, dinistiq is a minimalistic approach to component based application setup for the Java SE. Using only one scope with mostly singletons it adds very new few external dependencies to your project.

Switch branches/tags

Latest commit


Git stats


Failed to load latest commit information.
Latest commit message
Commit time


Minimalistic Dependency Injection

Latest Release Build Status Build Status Coverage Status Coverage Status

A small footprint approach to dependency injection with a framework or container implemented in Java.

Or: What I got wrong about DI

Minimalistic library to use dependency injection for the wire-up of software components. It thus mostly deals with singletons - some of them implementing interfaces - which should be injected as dependencies into one another taking into account their name, qualifier.

As the only other option besides the single scope managed by dinistiq it allows for the creation of fresh instances with all dependencies filled in from the scope of all beans collected.

Fire up the wire up

Dinistiq scans a given portion of the classpath for classes annotated with JSR330 Annotations. It does not introduce any custom annotations.

The missing bits can be configured by a set of properties files, describing

  • additional components that should be instanciated
  • additional values that should be injected into the instanciated components but cannot be derived from the autoscanned parts

Convention over Configuration

First of all the most important thing to use dinistiq is to annotate your dependencies with JSR @Inject so that dinistiq can find out which components are needed.

public class TestComponentB {

    public TestInterface test;

} // TestComponentB

In the next step dinistiq resolves those components from the auto-scanned portion of the classpath where it instanciates all classes annotated with @Singleton. Optionally these components may be named with @Named (with an optional name as the value parameter). Without a name given as a parameter, components are always named after their class name without the package name and a decapitalized first letter.

public class TestComponent implements TestInterface {

} // TestComponent

Thus in this example the instanciated bean of class TestComponent will be available with the name testComponent. The term "name" is used in this document since it is used as the parameter name in the JSR330 annotations. Since names must be unique within the scope they are in this case in fact identifiers througout the whole process.

If you are dealing with components of the same type, not only the beans may be named but also the injection point might indicate to require a bean with a certain name.

public class ConfigStuff {

    public String filename;

    public String somePrefix;

} // ConfigStuff

In this case, filename is searched as a String component with the name "filename", while somePrefix has a specific named annotation with value "prefix".

This complete set-up is done without any configuration for dinistiq itself but only for the components to be used.

Configuration through annotations

JSR330 specifies the concept of qualifiers to select which implementation of an interface is to be chosen. Unfortunately this means, that the injection point defines which implementation is chosen in the Java code. So we recommend not to use this in your code but add configuration files (see below) to control the selection of implementing classes outside the code.

You may defined annotations describing qualifiers

@Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.FIELD})
public @interface TestQualifier {
} // TestQualifier

and these qualifiers may be used to define injection criteria at the injection points.

public class QualifiedInjection {

    private TestInterface testInterface;

} // QualifiedInjection

Only implementation annotated with the given qualifier are take into account when performing the injection.

public class QualifiedComponent implements TestInterface {

} // QualifiedComponent

Optional Configuration with properties files

If this is not enough, you can explicitly add some beans to be instanciated in properties files.


Those files must simply be put in the folder dinistiq/ anywhere on your classpath. This example will instanciate the class dinistiq.test.components.UnannotatedComponent and store this bean with the name unannotatedComponent in the set of available beans.

The properties files are scanned in alphabetical order, so you can override the class for e.g. unannotatedComponent in a latter properties file, so classes given for bean names used in can be overridden in

For any of the instanciated beans you can provide more values to explicitly inject - again by the use of properties files.

After instanciation of the bean, a properties file with the bean's name as its base filename is searched - first in the dinistiq/defaults/ and then in the dinistiq/beans/ folders on the classpath. Thus you can deliver your components with a reasonable defaults and necessary overrides for the specific application.

file dinistiq/beans/


This will call the property setter setActivateCaching() on the bean named example. The grammar of the properties files describing the explicit injection supports set and list type collections, boolean values, numeric value, strings, and references to other beans.

file dinistiq/beans/

# numerics
# references
# strings and references in compound strings
replacement=a string
replacementTest=here comes ${replacement}

The bean named example is either a result of the automatic discovery of a class named Example

public class Example {

} // Example

a name declaration from the scanned class

public class ExampleComponent  {

} // ExampleComponent

or taken from the naming in a configuration properties file

file dinistiq/


At the top level, the types of the beans cannot be inferred, as the example


showed. If you need some typical configuration types at this level - like e.g. Strings, Booleans, Lists, and Maps, some extensions of this mere class based syntax had to be introduced. Any simple type found in the java.lang package can be intanciated with a value bound to it, since these values are immutable and there are thus no modifiable fields or setters in these classes.

stringValue=java.lang.String("string value")

are some examples for this. While


creates and empty map instance. Like with any other bean, the contents of this map can be modified by a properties file. In this case the contents of the properties file's key / value pairs will be used as content for the whole map.

Lists of strings can be created by


How to use

Extend your project with the dependency to the rather small dinistiq library file. Dinistiq releases are available from JCenter. The group id and artifact id are both 'dinistiq'.

Thus for projects built with gradle you will need to add to your repositories sections of the build file the line


if it's not there already and the dependency to the artifact in the dependencies section.

compile "dinistiq:dinistiq:0.8.1"

Projects built with Apache Maven need the following steps:

module pom.xml


base pom.xml




Dinistiq uses slf4j for logging and logback as an instance for testing.

Snapshot artifacts currently for version 0.9-SNAPSHOT are available from the OJO repository:

Apart from optional configuration files to be placed somehere on your classpath, you simply have to tell dinistiq which portion of the classpath to scan for annotations.

public class Test  {

    public static main(String[] args) {
        Set<String> packages = new HashSet<String>();
        Dinistiq d = new Dinistiq(packages);
    } // main()

} // Test

Make this portion of the classpath as small as ever possible or point to some invented and thus empty package, if you want to avoid scanning.

After this step you can ask dinistiq for instances of the components it created and injected.

public class Test  {

    public static main(String[] args) {
        Set<String> packages = new HashSet<String>();
        Dinistiq d = null;
        try {
            d = new Dinistiq(packages);
        } catch (Exception e) {
        } // try/catch
        TestInterface ti = d.findTypedBean(TestInterface.class);
        TestInterface test = d.findBean(TestInterface.class, "test");
        Set<TestInterface> tis = d.findTypedBeans(TestInterface.class);
    } // main()

} // Test

Web embedding

Dinistiq comes with a very lean web integration. An ordered list of beans implementing the servlet interface will be registered directly with the servlet container.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app xmlns="" xmlns:xsi=""





The context loader listener tries to find the servlets from the dinistiq context by asking for RegisterableServlet instances.

 * Servlets which should handle requests fulfilling a certain regular expression for their uris.
public interface RegisterableServlet extends Servlet, Comparable<RegisterableServlet> {

     * Returns a set of url patterns this servlet should be registered for.
    Set<String> getUrlPatterns();

     * Indicator if the implementing instance should be considered earlier or later
     * in the servlet selection process.
    int getOrder();

} // RegisterableServlet

So a servlet has to tell which url patterns its requests should meet, to be able to handle them. Additionally it tells an order number to sort all available servlets to provide a certain precedency rule for them.

Custom Class Resolver

It is perfectly possible that you will find our class resolving pretty dumb. So we provide the option to pass over a class resolver instance to dinistiq instead of the set of package names.

public class Test  {

    public static main(String[] args) {
        Set<String> packages = new HashSet<String>();
        Dinistiq d = null;
        ClassResolver classResolver = new BetterClassResolver(packages);
        try {
            d = new Dinistiq(classResolver);
        } catch (Exception e) {
        } // try/catch
    } // main()

} // Test

Be sure to add the package dinistiq in these cases as shown above. Otherwise for obvious reasons the properties files from the dinistiq path cannot be found as resources to be taken into consideration.

If you want to use custom class resolvers with the web integration you need to implement a class resolver taking the set of package names as the single parameter to the constructor and put the name of this implementing class in the context loader listener configuration for dinistiq.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app xmlns="" xmlns:xsi=""





Within the web application all beans from the dinistiq scope are available in the application scope (servlet context) as attributes.

External Components

If your software needs to use some components which cannot be instanciated or obtained using all of the means presented here, you can pass over a named set of instances as a base set of beans for dinistiq to add the scanned and configured beans to.

We use this to e.g. put the servlet context in the set of beans for web integration (see below).

public class DinistiqContextLoaderListener implements ServletContextListener {

    public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent contextEnvironment) {
        ServletContext context = contextEnvironment.getServletContext();
        Set<String> packages = new HashSet<String>();
        try {
            Map<String, Object> externalBeans = new HashMap<String, Object>();
            externalBeans.put("servletContext", context);
            Dinistiq dinistiq = new Dinistiq(packages, externalBeans);
            context.setAttribute(DINISTIQ_INSTANCE, dinistiq);
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            LOG.error("init()", ex);
        } // try/catch
    } // contextInitialized()

} // DinistiqContextLoaderListener

Besides the one managed Scope

Dinistiq defines just one scope of beans you can grab beans from. If you need fresh instances of beans where the members of this scope should be injected on creation and optional post construct methods should be called just following the same rules as the beans from the dinistiq scope, you will find a createBeans() method besides all the options to find existing beans in the scope.

My myNewInstance = dinistiq.createBean(My.class, null);

If this is still no option, you can - like with external beans - provide instances externally and let dinistiq still handle their injections and post construct methods.

My myNewInstance = new My();
dinistiq.initBean(myNewInstance, null);


While dinistiq 0.4 happily works with Java 8, only dinistiq 0.5 and up can be compiled and tested with Java 8. The old PaaS Google App Engine is only supported with dinistiq 0.4.

Up to dinistiq 0.5 the code is supposed to be written in Java 7 with a subsequent switch to Java 8. This also results in the fact, that the classic version of Google App Engine is only supported up to version 0.4.

The code for dinistiq is prepared for building with Gradle. Gradle versions up to 5.2.1 are tested to be working, while dinistiq starting from version 0.7 at least needs Gradle 2.12. We now use the gradle wrapper on CI servers and switched to Gradle version 5.4.1 for all builds. Due to breaking DSL changes versions 0.9 and up need at least gradle 4.3.1.

dinistiq Version Works with Compiles with Servlet API
0.4 Java 7 / 8 Java 7 2.5
0.5 Java 7 / 8 Java 7 / 8 3.1
0.6 Java 8 Java 8 3.1
0.7 Java 8 Java 8 3.1
0.8.1 Java 8 Java 8 4.0
0.9 Java 11 Java 11 4.0
0.x Java ? Java ? 5.0


The developer of SilkDI presents an interesting comparison of some DI implementations done in Java and we want to add some values for dinistiq to this list:

Library dinistiq
Version 0.8.1
Archive size <25kB
Further dependencies 3
Methods in injector/context 10
Container Model flat instances
Configuration style annotation,properties
Wiring style automatic scan
Generics support limitted
Generic type safety -
Wildcard generics -
Primitive types handling -
Bind to all (generic) supertypes yes
Type link -
Annotation guidance only JSR330
Constructor injection yes
Field injection yes
Setter injection yes
Factory methods no
Static injection yes
Method interception no
Providers (limited)
Optional injection yes
Mixed injection ?
Post construction hook yes
Arrays no
Collections partly
Multibinds yes
Sequence of declarations undefined
Scopes limited
Default scope Singleton
Custom scopes -
Available scopes Singleton
Error behaviour
Dependency cycles illegal
Detection of a cyclic dependencies error runtime

The closest competitor of dinistiq seems to be TinyDI - It recognises JSR330 Annotation but seems to lack the option of config files like the simple properties file mechanism of dinistiq. Additionally - unlike Spring and dinistiq - it depends on public setters for the injections. Private members with the @Inject annotation are not enough. Also it is fairly unmaintained for some years now.

Another option I ran into is Feather described in this article. It lacks too many injection options to be usefull for the injection scenarios presented here like injecting after instanciation with a @PostConstruct method to complete initialization.

History and Why

I rather apologise to introduce another Dependency Injection Container for the Java world - dinistiq - a very minimalistic approach to the topic. It turned out to be easier to implement another one, than to use others listed here. Limited in features, easy to use, and still more configurable than other options I could think of. After some months of use, I now can invite other users to take a look at it and try it in their own projects.

Also this text gives you a "why" on the use of the JSR 330 annotations for Dependency Injection. It simply makes your code even more reusable in case your development or deployment environment changes.

Since tangram is much more about glueing together proven existing software components and frameworks than writing code, I felt the need to check if the existing code base was really fully dependent on the Spring Framework.

Despite the fact that spring more or less in many ways does what I need, it sometimes feels a bit bloated and does too much magic I don't understand in detail (which I still had to learn when debugging things). So I tried to isolate the spring code during the tangram 0.9 work and present at least a second solution for all the things I did with spring so far.

For tangram spring does three things

  • Dependency Injection to plug the whole application together
  • support a decent view layer with JSP and Apache Velocity views
  • A concise way to map http requests to code - controller classes or methods

So I took a look at other view frameworks like Vaadin, GWT, Apache Wicket, Play, Struts, JSF/JEE, Stripes. Right at the moment I think Vaading, GWT, Wicket, and Play are no really good fit for tangram, Struts in my eyes is a fading technology, and only JSF/JEE is an obvious option. With Java Server Faces I only had unsatisfying project experiences and the rest of JEE goes for plain Servlet. So tangram had to be provided with a plain servlet way of doing the view layer.

Since the modularity of tangram was achieved by the Spring way of plugging components together with Dependency Injection, the first thing to do was, to mark the generic components in a spring independent way and to look at the other options for the Dependency Injection part. Only then it would be possible to replace the spring view layer with a servlet view layer during the startup and wire-up of the application.

So the list of relevant DI frameworks gets shortened to those supporting the generic Dependency Injection annotations from JSR330 which are intended for JEE and can e.g. also be used with Google Guice and the Spring Framework alike.

From the reading Google Guice seemed to be a good alternative for the proof of concept phase, but it took me that much work to get something to run with it (not everything can be plugged together programmatically in my case), that I came out faster with my own Dependency Injection Container. Rather minimalistic and only suited for the setup of components.

Its advantage over Guice is that it's smaller and easier to configure with properties files. Weeks later I discovered TinyDI as another option. While this container seems to be a lot cleverer about the search of annotated classes, it seems to lack the needed option of extending the configuration aspects from the annotations with properties files - defaults and overridden values and references.


Minimalistic Dependency Injection - Or: what I got wrong about dependency injection. Done in Java based solely on the JSR 330 annotations, dinistiq is a minimalistic approach to component based application setup for the Java SE. Using only one scope with mostly singletons it adds very new few external dependencies to your project.








No packages published