-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposed modifications to PR on lazy consensus-seeking process #1
Proposed modifications to PR on lazy consensus-seeking process #1
Conversation
CPC-CHARTER.md
Outdated
|
||
If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus a CPC member can call for either a closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next meeting. | ||
The call for a vote must be seconded by a majority of the CPC or else the discussion will continue. | ||
If an agenda item cannot reach consensus after a reasonable period of discussion, a voting member can call for objections to be overruled through an asynchronous vote. If this call is seconded by another voting member, an asynchronous vote must be organized. For the objections to be overruled, at least 2/3 of all voting members must vote in favor of overruling the objections. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you remove references to "agenda item" I had specifically removed those references as I don't think we want to imply that our concensus seeking is done in meetings or even requires one. Anywhere is says agenda item I think it should say "proposal"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch!
Signed-off-by: Tobie Langel <tobie@unlockopen.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.