We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For me there's no reason to use .litcoffee if GitHub won't display it.
.litcoffee
As an alternative CoffeeScript supports .coffee.md
Anyone interested in adding support for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We can, should we? Does anyone actually use literate coffee? I was surprised that we got the first PR for litcoffee.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I used it for the first time in a recent project and like how it's nicely self-documenting.
examples: https://github.com/daniellmb/angular-test-patterns/blob/master/spec/lib/parse.util.coffee.md https://github.com/daniellmb/angular-test-patterns/blob/master/spec/rules/lint-free.spec.coffee.md
I find it's especially useful to facilitate a go-to-definition style of cross-linking between code.
go-to-definition
No branches or pull requests
For me there's no reason to use
.litcoffee
if GitHub won't display it.As an alternative CoffeeScript supports .coffee.md
Anyone interested in adding support for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: