Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve writable views #223

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Nov 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

danibix95
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Description

This PR provides a review of "Writable Views" functionality, such that:

  • main functionality has been revised
  • multi-lookup (one-to-many relationships) definition has been fixed and an example can now be found in the docs
  • the feature's documentation has been rewritten to better clarify the use case of it

PR Checklist

  • The commit message follows our guidelines included in the CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

@danibix95 danibix95 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
docs/50_Writable_Views.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/50_Writable_Views.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/50_Writable_Views.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/50_Writable_Views.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danibix95 danibix95 merged commit b26e105 into v6.x Nov 21, 2023
2 checks passed
@danibix95 danibix95 deleted the refactor/improve-writable-views branch November 21, 2023 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants