added note that what is missing from this proposal is an intigration …

…of the theory from the class. ie Andy Lavender- performance in the twenty-first century see perhaps blurring between performer and spectator and awareness of being both. archive and the repertoire and GITHUB? possible thinking through post-postmodernism as a 'return to praxis, materiality, getting things done' (someone in class...) but also copresence see:colocation. what is mackenzie's formulation of technical performance? engagement isn't just about affect, its about temporality, the nowness of being connected. ALSO Bay-Cheng article how the traces are different fromt the original. as lavender also writes about the diff between gen x and y that y knows they're being watched, this also feeds into github being a social network with profiles. I get satisfaction from seeing my commit frequency displayed on my front page. see also EJ Westlake. possible harvie, see page 26 and 30, then page 109 on craftmanship driven by quality of work

proposal.txt

@@ -16,10 +16,11 @@ The following workflow has been adopted for the composition of this paper: Each
 
 This is significant in that the author has in past solo endeavors opted to work in very long sprints between documentation. What documentation does emerge from these processes is at most frequent made in haste following the end of a session. This coarse degree of resolution hinders future effort to speculate on decisions made and to imagine recourse for ongoing work. Further, it has been the experience of this author that such an opacity toward creative decision-making impedes the opening up of a given project to future collaboration. 
 
-In addition to developing an analysis of version control systems in the context of archival and performance studies, this paper will leverage git as a research-creation tool by presenting a detailed account of its own ontogenesis. 
+In addition to developing an analysis of version control systems in the contexts of archival and performance studies, this paper will leverage git as a research-creation tool by presenting a detailed account of its own ontogenesis. 
 
  and may make use of: excerpts from the author’s comments about a change to a draft; visualizations of the comparison of changes; and trends in the author’s process, including attentional detail and affect. 
 
+what is missing is the theory from the class!