Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pmc 22661 ahead of print #22

Closed

Conversation

Klortho
Copy link
Contributor

@Klortho Klortho commented Jun 9, 2015

This adds support for a new date field, epub-date, as described in the xbiblio-devel email thread, How to encode and process "ahead of print".

@rmzelle
Copy link

rmzelle commented Jun 18, 2015

@michel-kraemer, note that the addition of "epub-date" to CSL hasn't been decided yet, and that we'll probably go with a different name. We'll keep track of this in citation-style-language/schema#125

@michel-kraemer
Copy link
Owner

@rmzelle Yes, I know. That's why I haven't merged the PR yet. Thanks for the link anyhow.

@Klortho
Copy link
Contributor Author

Klortho commented Jun 18, 2015

@michel-kraemer , I'll update the branch (and this PR), once they release a new version of the schema. You can close it if you want, or leave it open for a placeholder.

@michel-kraemer
Copy link
Owner

Thanks, @Klortho! I'll leave it open as a reminder.

@michel-kraemer
Copy link
Owner

@Klortho Any news here? Can we close the PR now or is this still being discussed?

@rmzelle
Copy link

rmzelle commented Nov 18, 2016

Well, on the CSL side we don't have solid schedule yet on the next release, so this could take a while to get resolved.

@Klortho
Copy link
Contributor Author

Klortho commented Nov 18, 2016

Nothing has changed on our end. I still have an open task to write the NLM citation CSL, and it's heating up -- I'd really like to get it off my plate soon. @rmzelle , is the new date field implemented already, so we're just waiting for the next release? (I see that [my PR|https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/pull/125] is not pulled, but I remember that you said you were going to implement it with a different name).

@rmzelle
Copy link

rmzelle commented Nov 18, 2016

@rmzelle , is the new date field implemented already, so we're just waiting for the next release?

No. I don't expect resistance to adding an electronic publishing date variable, but the exact variable name is somewhat up for grabs until we freeze the changes for the next release. I'm running out of things to procrastinate on, though, so we should see a new release in 2017.

@michel-kraemer
Copy link
Owner

This pull request is just too old. I'm closing it now. Please open a new issue if necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants