New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fraction variation influences "status" #29
Comments
Just to clarify, do you mean if you run something like The other situation where "status" can pop up is when you set the logging level to INFO, In that case, you might see reports of the status, however that is often fixed with the automatic crossover. QP solvers are usually less accurate so it is possible to get a |
Yes! Thank you a lot for all the information and to have offered some ideas to solve it. |
Yes that is somebody we are working on. Right now it would require some adjustments to make it work with micom since you have to connect the external medium of your community with the gut lumen in Harvetta/Harvey. What already works is using the exchanges from Harvetta/Harvey a medium input for MICOM (at least when using AGORA that has a comp[atible ID system). |
Awesome sauce!! Looking forward for that 🥇 |
Great, closing for now. For general questions also feel free to use the Discussions. |
Hi!
I have a question about the flag "status" which comes as an output when "cooperative_tradeoff" is run. In particular, sometimes I get as a result "optimal" but most of times I get "numeric". What does it mean?
Sincerely,
Arianna Basile
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: