Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tck with observations #3410

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Tck with observations #3410

merged 3 commits into from Sep 19, 2022

Conversation

marcingrzejszczak
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak added the enhancement A general enhancement label Sep 13, 2022
@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak added this to the 1.10.0-RC1 milestone Sep 13, 2022
@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak force-pushed the tck_with_observations branch 2 times, most recently from f234368 to b328e2d Compare September 14, 2022 11:22
// Allows parameter resolution in BeforeEach and AfterEach
// Based on
// https://code-case.hashnode.dev/how-to-pass-parameterized-test-parameters-to-beforeeachaftereach-method-in-junit5
static class AfterBeforeParameterResolver implements BeforeEachMethodAdapter, ParameterResolver {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a shame we need to maintain this code here, but unless junit-team/junit5#944 is implemented, I guess we don't have much of a choice.

@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak merged commit dfdc721 into main Sep 19, 2022
@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak deleted the tck_with_observations branch September 19, 2022 06:54
izeye added a commit to izeye/micrometer that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
shakuzen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants