Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

let users specify the final_estimator and passthrough for the ensemble #48

Closed
sonichi opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@sonichi
Copy link
Collaborator

sonichi commented Mar 19, 2021

Is it possible to let users specify the final_estimator and passthrough for the ensemble, please? In practice sometimes the only meta learner can be accepted by the business is GLM. Single boosting models are OK but a boosting model of boosting models is just too complicated for the legal team and regulators. Regarding the passthrough, there is no guarantee that one way will be better than the other so perhaps it is better to let the users decide.

Appreciate your help!

Originally posted by @flippercy in #47 (comment)

@sonichi sonichi added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 19, 2021
sonichi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2021
@sonichi sonichi closed this as completed in 6ab0730 Sep 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant