Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose void return type and add reserved UDF names #2412

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

rick-nguyen
Copy link
Contributor

With imperative functions, add support for a void UDF type. Also some functions should not be allowed for UDF names like Set, Collect, etc.

@rick-nguyen rick-nguyen requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2024 20:05
@rick-nguyen rick-nguyen enabled auto-merge (squash) May 22, 2024 17:11
@rick-nguyen rick-nguyen disabled auto-merge May 22, 2024 17:15
@LucGenetier
Copy link
Contributor

✅ No public API change.

@rick-nguyen rick-nguyen enabled auto-merge (squash) May 22, 2024 23:44
@CarlosFigueiraMSFT
Copy link
Contributor

    // Primitive types - Keeping it same as PrimitiveTypeSymbolTable

I know this is not part of your changes, but does this comment still make sense? I couldn't find any definition for "PrimitiveTypeSymbolTable"


Refers to: src/libraries/Microsoft.PowerFx.Core/Public/Types/FormulaType.cs:77 in ca62f6f. [](commit_id = ca62f6f, deletion_comment = False)

@LucGenetier
Copy link
Contributor

✅ No public API change.

Shpakh-MSFT
Shpakh-MSFT previously approved these changes May 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Shpakh-MSFT Shpakh-MSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@LucGenetier
Copy link
Contributor

✅ No public API change.

Copy link
Contributor

@adithyaselv adithyaselv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@rick-nguyen rick-nguyen merged commit 2838431 into main May 23, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants