Updating doNd notebook with comparing Measurement context manager with qcodes doNd

[FarBo]

This PR compares two things in 4 sections:
Comparing 1D and 2D sweeps when z parameter depends on x and y parameters sweeps (This is not the goal of this PR anymore)
Comparing the use of Measurement context manager with qcodes doNd.

Update: After careful consideration, it is decided to extend this existing notebook with the content of Measurement.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2512 (fc3d9d3) into master (0074889) will increase coverage by 1.29%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2512      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.30%   63.60%   +1.29%     
==========================================
  Files         200      198       -2     
  Lines       26412    25929     -483     
==========================================
+ Hits        16457    16493      +36     
+ Misses       9955     9436     -519     

[FarBo]

@jenshnielsen
@astafan8

Could you look at the modifications of the notebook. If you think, it is acceptable in its current form, we can have it in the release.

[astafan8]

Meaurement took 41.3532292842865 seconds - this is too long. Can we reduce this to ~seconds while still making a point? do we even need the sleep() calls now that "timings of buffered aquisition" is not in scope?

[FarBo]

this is too long.

This is the minimum sleep. I kept this because earlier in the notebook, I promoted using plottr to see the live plot. For having that, We need sleep time. One thing that I can do is to give the sleep for the outer loop. Then It takes 5 to 6 seconds.

[FarBo]

@jenshnielsen
My bad not setting the conversations resolved. Thanks for reminding it. I think all comments have been addressed now, hopefully :).

[jenshnielsen]

I am a bit confused as how this compares to the existing dond notebook. There seems to be a lot of duplicated content. Perhaps it is better to extend that notebook to explain how the experiments in that notebook can be done using the existing measurement framwork?

[FarBo]

The modified version of this notebook caused this duplication. In the current format of this notebook, It's reasonable to extend the other notebook with Measurement comparison. It might need an updated title such as : Using doNd functions in comparison to Measurement for performing measurements or something similar.

[jenshnielsen]

Left some comments inline. The overall structure is good but we need to work a bit on the writing

[FarBo]

@jenshnielsen
@astafan8

After some back and forth, we decided to improve the already existed doNd notebook with comparing doNds with Measurement instead of creating a new notebook.
I think Jens already reviewed it. So, you may have a look (hopefully the final one :) ).

[astafan8]

Looks good! and the execution time of the whole notebook is on the order of 1-2 seconds, right?

[FarBo]

The execution time may be about 15 seconds for the whole notebook.