Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement LWG-3677 Is a cv-qualified pair specially handled in uses-allocator construction? #3396

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Feb 26, 2023

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3220.

Driven-by changes:

Also `_STD`-qualify all _Ugly names in `<scoped_allocator>` and `<xpolymorphic_allocator.h>`.

Also change try-catch block in `<xpolymorphic_allocator.h>` to scoped guard.
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2023 15:54
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added the LWG Library Working Group issue label Feb 8, 2023
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added this to Initial Review in Code Reviews via automation Feb 8, 2023
@StephanTLavavej

This comment was marked as resolved.

@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

I am a greedy kitty who is speculatively mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter moved this from Final Review to Ready To Merge in Code Reviews Feb 25, 2023
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit 4892676 into microsoft:main Feb 26, 2023
Code Reviews automation moved this from Ready To Merge to Done Feb 26, 2023
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thanks for implementing this LWG issue resolution, getting that chart line closer to zero! 📉 😸 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
LWG Library Working Group issue
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LWG-3677 Is a cv-qualified pair specially handled in uses-allocator construction?
3 participants