Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove some workaround for Clang #3722

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 30, 2023

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

LLVM-47414, LLVM-51580, LLVM-55945, and LLVM-56379 should have been fixed in Clang16. Let's remove the workarounds.

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2023 05:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to Initial Review in Code Reviews May 21, 2023
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter added the enhancement Something can be improved label May 22, 2023
Copy link
Member

@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm approving despite thinking that maybe we should keep around _Bci_order and _Not_bci_order; I'd like to see what other people think. I'm also applying some changes to the pre-existing const range access CPO constraints that may someday help the compiler provide more targeted error messages.

stl/inc/xutility Show resolved Hide resolved
stl/inc/xutility Show resolved Hide resolved
stl/inc/xutility Show resolved Hide resolved
stl/inc/xutility Show resolved Hide resolved
stl/inc/xutility Show resolved Hide resolved
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter moved this from Initial Review to Final Review in Code Reviews May 22, 2023
@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter moved this from Final Review to Ready To Merge in Code Reviews May 24, 2023
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this May 26, 2023
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit 29fccab into microsoft:main May 30, 2023
35 checks passed
Code Reviews automation moved this from Ready To Merge to Done May 30, 2023
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

Thanks for these cleanups and helping to lock in a higher level of conformance! 🧹 📈 😻

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the workaround-clang-16 branch May 30, 2023 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Something can be improved
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants