Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sanitizes Code Reviews README and adds information about metrics #172

Closed

Conversation

tompaana
Copy link
Member

  • Moves guidance solely focused on how to create PRs into its own file
  • Sanitizes and restructures README.md
  • Adds information on code reviews metrics
  • Adds useful resources

Addresses issues #168 and #120

@tompaana tompaana added the code reviews Code reviews topic label Feb 27, 2020
@p-schuler
Copy link
Contributor

Could you link the issues in the "Linked issues" section of the PR pls?

1 similar comment
@p-schuler
Copy link
Contributor

Could you link the issues in the "Linked issues" section of the PR pls?

Copy link
Contributor

@p-schuler p-schuler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you link the issues in the "Linked issues" section of the PR pls?

code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
This was linked to issues Feb 27, 2020
Copy link
Member

@TessFerrandez TessFerrandez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great.
I just have one concern, there is a PR being reviewed currently on the same readme about size guidance.
Perhaps you should coordinate so that the changes here (or areas that you already checked and feel are ok) don't get overwritten by that as I think a lot of them are in the same sections.

code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@TessFerrandez TessFerrandez added this to Reviewer approved in Engineering Playbook Backlog via automation Feb 28, 2020
Copy link
Member

@TessFerrandez TessFerrandez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

code-reviews/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
code-reviews/pull-requests.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Engineering Playbook Backlog automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Needs review Mar 2, 2020
@tompaana
Copy link
Member Author

tompaana commented Mar 4, 2020

Closing this PR as it has become convoluted, and starting fresh.

@tompaana tompaana closed this Mar 4, 2020
Engineering Playbook Backlog automation moved this from Needs review to Done Mar 4, 2020
@tompaana tompaana deleted the 168_sanitize_code_reviews_readme branch March 4, 2020 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code reviews Code reviews topic
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sanitize code reviews README Investigate: measurable CRs
4 participants