Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[weird behavior] In compass pressing the arrow down from 360 goes 359.99, 359, 358, etc... #71

Closed
digeff opened this issue Jun 9, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

[weird behavior] In compass pressing the arrow down from 360 goes 359.99, 359, 358, etc... #71

digeff opened this issue Jun 9, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
@albertinad
Labels
bug priority-low
Milestone
vNext

Comments

@digeff
Copy link

digeff commented Jun 9, 2016

In compass pressing the arrow down from 360 goes 359.99, 359, 358, etc...
image
image
image
@albertinad albertinad self-assigned this Jun 9, 2016
@dlebu dlebu added the bug label Jun 14, 2016
@dlebu dlebu added this to the vNext milestone Jun 14, 2016
@albertinad albertinad mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2016
Merged
albertinad added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2016
@albertinad
Several compass simulation fixes (#100)
217e803 
Fixing displaying the heading value on initialize [#86]
Validating compass maximum and minimum values. [#71]
- Checking limits values according to the plugin spec
- Updating input number step to 0.5 to be consistent with
geolocation simulation control
@albertinad
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed in #100

@albertinad
Copy link
Collaborator

@dlebu I noticed that this issue is scheduled for vNext milestone right now, but I already fixed it with a couple of more fixes related to the compass.

@dlebu
Copy link
Contributor

dlebu commented Jun 28, 2016

@albertinad No problem. Thanks for the fixes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@albertinad albertinad

Labels
bug priority-low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
vNext
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@albertinad @dlebu @digeff