Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 4, 2020. It is now read-only.

feat(ItemLayout): add props interface and improve props typings #142

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2018

Conversation

mnajdova
Copy link
Contributor

This PR introduces props interface for the ItemLayout component, as part of #117

@mnajdova mnajdova changed the title feat(ItemLayout): add props interface feat(ItemLayout): add props interface and improve props typings Aug 27, 2018
@levithomason levithomason mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2018
19 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #142 into master will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #142      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.04%   88.93%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines         776      768       -8     
  Branches      112      112              
==========================================
- Hits          691      683       -8     
  Misses         83       83              
  Partials        2        2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/components/ItemLayout/ItemLayout.tsx 82.97% <100%> (-2.48%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7c2ea88...621615e. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@levithomason levithomason left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@kuzhelov kuzhelov merged commit 405a01d into master Aug 28, 2018
@kuzhelov kuzhelov deleted the feat/item-layout-prop-interface branch August 28, 2018 15:47
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants