Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add omnibus_embedding_pairwise to pipeline module #823

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Aug 19, 2021
Merged

Conversation

nicaurvi
Copy link
Contributor

  • Does this PR add any new dependencies?
  • Does this PR modify any existing APIs?
    • Is the change to the API backwards compatible?
  • Have you built the documentation (reference and/or tutorial) and verified the generated documentation is appropriate?

Reference Issues/PRs

What does this implement/fix? Briefly explain your changes.

Add wrapper api to omnibus and add the pairwise omni technique used in topologic

Any other comments?

Added a couple elbow cut tests for pipeline ase/lse just for peace of mind.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 19, 2021

❌ Deploy Preview for graspologic failed.

🔨 Explore the source changes: d1c2aab

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/graspologic/deploys/611eaded4491d00007f4bc84

@nicaurvi nicaurvi self-assigned this Aug 19, 2021
@nicaurvi nicaurvi merged commit 07c7892 into dev Aug 19, 2021
Comment on lines +154 to +161
# create a graph that contains all nodes and edges across the entire corpus
union_graph = graphs[0].copy()
for graph in graphs[1:]:
union_graph.add_edges_from(graph.edges())

union_graph_lcc = largest_connected_component(union_graph)
union_graph_lcc_nodes = union_graph_lcc.nodes()
union_node_ids = np.array(list(union_graph_lcc_nodes))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nyecarr maybe you can use this in #824 too?

@nicaurvi nicaurvi deleted the omni-pipeline branch August 20, 2021 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants