Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plumb QEO to XDP #3632

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 16, 2023
Merged

Plumb QEO to XDP #3632

merged 3 commits into from
May 16, 2023

Conversation

nibanks
Copy link
Member

@nibanks nibanks commented May 16, 2023

Description

Wire up the initial plumbing to QEO in XDP.

Testing

Must wait for real HW or official tests.

Documentation

N/A

@nibanks nibanks requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2023 12:13
@nibanks nibanks added the Area: Lola Related to low latency work label May 16, 2023
@nibanks nibanks changed the title Xdp-plumb-qeo Plumb QEO to XDP May 16, 2023
Comment on lines +1339 to +1344
//
// The following logic just tries all interfaces and if it's able to offload
// to any of them, it considers it a success. Long term though, this should
// only offload to the interface that the socket is bound to.
//

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we allow enabling some of interfaces, we need to know which interfaces are offloading? to disable the offloading ones later

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, but not sure the operation is _ADD or _REMOVE...
Code could be really complex then

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now, the goal isn't to make this perfect, but to just unblock experimentation. So I think this is good enough right now. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, offloading functionality point of view, it should be OK for now

@nibanks nibanks merged commit 228bc73 into main May 16, 2023
356 of 361 checks passed
@nibanks nibanks deleted the xdp-plumb-qeo branch May 16, 2023 17:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Lola Related to low latency work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants