Fixing agent code.

[nharper285]

Summary of the Pull Request

What is this about?
Fixing an agent code error related to clippy that occurs during the build.

Original errors:

PR Checklist

• Applies to work item: #xxx
• CLA signed. If not, go over here and sign the CLI.
• Tests added/passed
• Requires documentation to be updated
• I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx

Info on Pull Request

What does this include?
Changes to lib.rs

Validation Steps Performed

Confirming build runs.

[ranweiler]

1. What was the actual lint?
2. Why did you change the program semantics, and why is that change okay / how did you test it?

[chkeita]

1. What was the actual lint?
2. Why did you change the program semantics, and why is that change okay / how did you test it?

@ranweiler i was the one that proposed the fix
here is the lint error

i tested it with string with and without ')' in it to see if it has the same behavior

[nharper285]

1. What was the actual lint?
2. Why did you change the program semantics, and why is that change okay / how did you test it?

Lint errors linked above. It's not clear to

1. What was the actual lint?
2. Why did you change the program semantics, and why is that change okay / how did you test it?

@ranweiler i was the one that proposed the fix here is the lint error

i tested it with string with and without ')' in it to see if it has the same behavior

I added both errors to the original description

[nharper285]

@ranweiler & @chkeita - I was slowly working through some of the other clippy errors and I suddenly got this dump:

This seems like it has a lot to do with coverage data? Is it appropriate to remove all of these unused fields? The last two have to do with 'large size difference between variants'? I can 'box' those, but I'm not sure if its correct for me to remove all those other fields.