Modify get_exp & get_recorder api #380
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
qianyun210603
pushed a commit
to qianyun210603/qlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
Modify get_exp & get_recorder api
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Change the API for
ExpManagerandExperiment.I keep the related API under
Rthe same to avoid too much complex logics being exposed to users. If uses want to get a running recorder to experiment without starting them, they should be aware about the design of Qlib and calls a lower level API.Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
pytest qlib/tests/test_all_pipeline.pyunder upper directory ofqlib.Screenshots of Test Results (if appropriate):
Types of changes