Ediit READMEs based on Simon's feedback; sync dependencies in conda script

[anargyri]

Description

• Made edits according to Simon's suggestions
• One of the suggestions was to sync dependencies in generate_conda_file.py with setup.py
• Part of the edits was instructions for conda and Python 3.7.

Related Issues

Checklist:

• I have followed the contribution guidelines and code style for this project.
• I have added tests covering my contributions.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• This PR is being made to staging branch and not to main branch.

[laserprec]

I think the code coverage decrease is not due to any changes in this PR. Please disregard if anyone is concerned about this. Please see below you want to know the details 😄:

Currently we have two pipelines running two slightly different tests: the pr-gate that runs only the unit tests and the code coverage is around 62% and the nightly build that runs the full tests suites: unit, smoke and integration tests. The coverage is around 74%. My last PR involved adding the nightly build so the PR runs the full nightly build and remembers the higher coverage number instead. This is a special occasion, and I don't think this inaccurate code coverage would recur once we bury the staging branch with more commits.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1515 (86e500c) into staging (c5029af) will decrease coverage by 12.21%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           staging    #1515       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    74.23%   62.02%   -12.22%     
============================================
  Files           84       84               
  Lines         8369     8369               
============================================
- Hits          6213     5191     -1022     
- Misses        2156     3178     +1022     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ecommenders/models/newsrec/io/mind_all_iterator.py	12.21% <0.00%> (-86.65%)	⬇️
recommenders/models/newsrec/io/mind_iterator.py	15.67% <0.00%> (-82.71%)	⬇️
...ommenders/models/deeprec/io/sequential_iterator.py	15.85% <0.00%> (-81.94%)	⬇️
recommenders/models/newsrec/models/base_model.py	30.90% <0.00%> (-59.40%)	⬇️
...deeprec/models/sequential/sequential_base_model.py	46.97% <0.00%> (-47.66%)	⬇️
recommenders/models/geoimc/geoimc_data.py	41.66% <0.00%> (-44.80%)	⬇️
...enders/models/deeprec/io/dkn_item2item_iterator.py	45.61% <0.00%> (-42.11%)	⬇️
...menders/models/deeprec/models/graphrec/lightgcn.py	51.47% <0.00%> (-40.24%)	⬇️
recommenders/datasets/mind.py	0.00% <0.00%> (-30.85%)	⬇️
recommenders/datasets/movielens.py	76.96% <0.00%> (-14.05%)	⬇️
... and 12 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c5029af...86e500c. Read the comment docs.

[miguelgfierro]

LGTM

[miguelgfierro]

after this is merged to staging a new doc is going to be generated. I'm not sure if pyspark dep is going to break the docs, let's see how it goes

[anargyri]

I tried the compilation of docs and it seems to work.