Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix transient test failures by increasing timeout for gbm shap method #2044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2023

Conversation

imatiach-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fix transient test failures by increasing timeout for gbm shap method.

Checklist

  • I have added screenshots above for all UI changes.
  • I have added e2e tests for all UI changes.
  • Documentation was updated if it was needed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2044 (45c6825) into main (0af6cef) will decrease coverage by 0.56%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 45c6825 differs from pull request most recent head 4a9dd3a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4a9dd3a to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2044      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.63%   93.08%   -0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          31       51      +20     
  Lines         581     2009    +1428     
==========================================
+ Hits          544     1870    +1326     
- Misses         37      139     +102     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.08% <ø> (-0.56%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 20 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

1 similar comment
@imatiach-msft imatiach-msft merged commit 11e0032 into main Apr 26, 2023
@imatiach-msft imatiach-msft deleted the ilmat/increase-to-gbm-ea branch April 26, 2023 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants