Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.Net: ADR for supporting more type info in FunctionView #3430

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

alliscode
Copy link
Member

Motivation and Context

An ADR proposing to add more type information to SKFunction and FunctionView in order to improve planners.

Description

Contribution Checklist

@shawncal shawncal added the docs and tests Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 9, 2023
@alliscode alliscode requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2023 03:49
@shawncal shawncal added .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code kernel.core labels Nov 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title ADR for supporting more type info in FunctionView .Net: ADR for supporting more type info in FunctionView Nov 10, 2023
@shawncal shawncal removed .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code kernel.core labels Nov 10, 2023
@lemillermicrosoft
Copy link
Member

in order to improve planners.

Want to call out for those following along, that these improvements would also enable OpenAPI response validation which is very important to ensuring RAI best practices.

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added the .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code label Mar 8, 2024
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft removed the .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code label Mar 8, 2024
@alliscode alliscode enabled auto-merge March 8, 2024 18:53
@alliscode alliscode added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit c57608c Mar 8, 2024
12 checks passed
@alliscode alliscode deleted the type-info-adr branch March 8, 2024 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs and tests Improvements or additions to documentation documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants