New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SSL4EO-S12: add new dataset/datamodule #1151
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
31 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e7afd1f
SSL4EO-S12: add new dataset
adamjstewart 44f2953
Style fixes
adamjstewart 45fc445
100% coverage
adamjstewart 729d377
fix mypy
adamjstewart a2f39d5
black fixes
adamjstewart 0f0e02d
mypy fix
adamjstewart 1ad0fb6
Convert from db to power
adamjstewart d2a8049
Don't cast to numpy
adamjstewart 3df7ec1
Remove comments referring to SeCo
adamjstewart a424a77
SSL4EO: add extraction time
adamjstewart ec0379a
Add RandomSeasonContrast
adamjstewart 6172fff
Fix axes indexing
adamjstewart 4b0774c
Add datamodule
adamjstewart 7b32aa3
fix tests
adamjstewart bd5962a
mypy fixes
adamjstewart 0265ccf
fix missing import
adamjstewart 6529150
Fix tests
adamjstewart 8268f6e
isort fix
adamjstewart 05dab7d
Typo fix
adamjstewart 1fd7a2b
s2c: add B10
adamjstewart 80a5c3a
Update test channels
adamjstewart fe28fe9
S2 plotting was broken
calebrob6 651347b
Fix plotting
calebrob6 5cae88d
Merge branch 'main' into datasets/ssl4eo
adamjstewart b4e4410
Black fix
adamjstewart c4a5c75
Merge branch 'main' into datasets/ssl4eo
adamjstewart 5dbcab6
Rename conf files
adamjstewart 8af0a53
Remove file introduced by bad merge
adamjstewart 87f068e
Fix pixel size of bands
adamjstewart d553b57
black fix
adamjstewart 90714a0
Better S1 plotting
adamjstewart File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@calebrob6 this directly contradicts the change made in #1027. Should we revert that PR too? Given that:
I'm starting to think we should use one of the default enhancements from QGIS:
There could even be an option to select which of these you want to use. We can decide and implement this later, but I want to make sure we're not contradicting ourselves and won't revert #1027 multiple times until we come up with a uniform policy. This also relates to #496.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dividing by 10k obviously didn't work though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then why did we merge #1027?