Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OSCD: reading files with PIL #258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2021
Merged

OSCD: reading files with PIL #258

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2021

Conversation

iejMac
Copy link
Contributor

@iejMac iejMac commented Nov 23, 2021

No description provided.

@iejMac iejMac closed this Nov 23, 2021
@iejMac iejMac reopened this Nov 23, 2021
adamjstewart
adamjstewart approved these changes Nov 23, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamjstewart adamjstewart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to work for me, I don't get any errors anymore.

@adamjstewart adamjstewart added the datasets Geospatial or benchmark datasets label Nov 23, 2021
@calebrob6 calebrob6 merged commit c3a61cf into microsoft:main Nov 23, 2021
@adamjstewart adamjstewart added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Nov 25, 2021
@adamjstewart adamjstewart added utilities Utilities for working with geospatial data and removed utilities Utilities for working with geospatial data labels Jan 2, 2022
yichiac pushed a commit to yichiac/torchgeo that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
@iejMac
OSCD: reading files with PIL (microsoft#258)
6c3902e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@calebrob6 calebrob6 calebrob6 approved these changes

@adamjstewart adamjstewart adamjstewart approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
datasets Geospatial or benchmark datasets
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.2.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@iejMac @calebrob6 @adamjstewart