[libmount] New port

[wrobelda]

Describe the pull request
- Adds new port
- Updates other ports (kf5kio, kf5solid, glib) to take advantage of it
- removes now redundant libmount-dev package from the linux VM

• What does your PR fix?

  See [vcpkg baseline][kf5solid] Fix usage #21344

• Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

  Linux.

• Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

  Yes

• If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

  Yes

[wrobelda]

All features have been tested with and without and behave as expected:

• kf5solid[libmount]
• glib[libmount]

[wrobelda]

FYI, Windows CI/CD cascades kf5 ports. See microsoft/vcpkg-tool#184 (comment)

[dg0yt]

In dependencies, you should use platform, not supports.

[dg0yt]

Sorry, I see it is meant to work in features, not dependencies.

[wrobelda]

FYI, Windows CI/CD cascades kf5 ports. See microsoft/vcpkg-tool#184 (comment)

This is now solved.

[vicroms]

LGTM

[vicroms]

Pinging @BillyONeal to ok this

[wrobelda]

FYI this was added by myself only recently as part of preparation for #20938 (still unmerged).

[wrobelda]

Also, since reviewing this I made libmount a default feature on Linux for kf5solid, as well as updated the FindLibMount.cmake after upstream had some suggestions.

[github-actions]

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

After committing all other changes, the version database must be updated

git add -u && git commit
git checkout 653912591af709c162fba2d4000a6b3362c8d3c9 -- versions
./vcpkg x-add-version --all

Diff

diff --git a/versions/e-/ecm.json b/versions/e-/ecm.json
index 0376164..ccfbb4d 100644
--- a/versions/e-/ecm.json
+++ b/versions/e-/ecm.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "versions": [
     {
-      "git-tree": "b9ea21e7dd8a4191cedd825fee0a22045f2d587d",
+      "git-tree": "0bd4113f8c0da00ac67473e5e52644036f1147ba",
       "version": "5.84.0",
       "port-version": 3
     },

[JackBoosY]

LGTM, @BillyONeal can you please review again?

Thanks.

[BillyONeal]

Thanks for the port :)