You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Markdown Link Definitions: VS Code does not jump to link definition when label includes back-ticks
Steps to reproduce the problem
(Please view this in the raw markdown and cut and paste it into VS Code to understand the issue fully)
In the example below, in the This Works example you will see that there is a valid link like under the github symbol and hovering over the symbol gives the tool tip 'Go to Link Definition' and clicking on the symbol will jump you to the bottom of the file and the associated link definition.
Conversly, in the This Doesn't Work example note that the label is surrounded by back-ticks and now the github symbol does not show a tool tip nor can it be clicked on to jump to the associated reference.
However, in preview mode both symbols will correctly redirect you to https://github.com
This Works
[github][github]
This Doesn't Work
[`github`][github]
<!-- links -->
[github]: https://github.com
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Markdown Link Definitions: VS Code does not jump to link definition when label includes back-ticks
Steps to reproduce the problem
(Please view this in the raw markdown and cut and paste it into VS Code to understand the issue fully)
In the example below, in the
This Works
example you will see that there is a valid link like under thegithub
symbol and hovering over the symbol gives the tool tip 'Go to Link Definition' and clicking on the symbol will jump you to the bottom of the file and the associated link definition.Conversly, in the
This Doesn't Work
example note that the label is surrounded by back-ticks and now thegithub
symbol does not show a tool tip nor can it be clicked on to jump to the associated reference.However, in preview mode both symbols will correctly redirect you to https://github.com
This Works
This Doesn't Work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: