Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code parsing for run selection in terminal - Python side #14457
Code parsing for run selection in terminal - Python side #14457
Changes from 10 commits
a9252a5
047de5e
c2b567e
2453d11
83017c3
3cdbf1b
1cccf80
e356340
8ce85a2
350046a
3728e66
38f56ef
39ed4c8
fd8ae87
8e38484
6870358
b29e6f5
5fb0985
44c15b3
394af97
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing that didn't occur to me when we were discussing this, is that for the multiline parentheses case, this newline is redundant, since the closing parenthesis terminates the statement already. So for this input:
The REPL will get a blank line between the two, even though it's not strictly needed:
I think that's okay, since that extra blank line doesn't change behavior, and appearance is not such a big deal for an uncommon code pattern. But it might be worth pointing out in the comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it change the repel default
_
by any chance? It should not, but just curious.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add a comment.
You mean the extra blank statement? Doesn't seem like it: