Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom filesystems - stabilization of FileSearchProvider and TextSearchProvider #205447

Closed
GraphR00t opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
*duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s)

Comments

@GraphR00t
Copy link

GraphR00t commented Feb 17, 2024

FileSearchProvider and TextSearchProvider are API proposals that are needed to make virtual filesystems more usable. Both APIs have been created several years ago.

Many extension writers have been regularly (re-)asking for the stabilization of both APIs. Would it be possible to have the two corresponding issues fixed this year ? VSCode is a great code editor, and its extension ecosystem is rich because it exposes many APIs to the extension writers. Thank you !

My use case

I am developping an extension that connects to a project server (LSP + custom methods) for development. There are no local files. I implement a FilesystemProvider that communicates with a virtual filesystem present on the project server.

Having FileSearchProvider and TextSearchProvider available (without the users needing to use VSCode Insiders) would greatly improve the UX.

@gjsjohnmurray
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @andreamah 🙏

@jrieken jrieken added the *duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s) label Feb 19, 2024
@VSCodeTriageBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for creating this issue! We figured it's covering the same as another one we already have. Thus, we closed this one as a duplicate. You can search for similar existing issues. See also our issue reporting guidelines.

Happy Coding!

@VSCodeTriageBot VSCodeTriageBot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
*duplicate Issue identified as a duplicate of another issue(s)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants