Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make manifest retrieval choice more dynamic #3738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

JohnMcPMS
Copy link
Member

@JohnMcPMS JohnMcPMS commented Oct 6, 2023

Change

This change lets the source implementation indicate whether manifests might contain more information than the search results. It then only applies that to REST, as the implementation is not under our control. This should have no net effect on the results quality, but should not attempt to retrieve manifests from the winget source when they are not providing any additional value currently.

Validation

Manually ensured no manifest retrieved for winget based package lookup in dev when one was done for the current release.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@JohnMcPMS JohnMcPMS requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2023 21:02
Copy link
Contributor

@yao-msft yao-msft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@JohnMcPMS JohnMcPMS merged commit 95dfc27 into microsoft:master Oct 9, 2023
8 checks passed
@JohnMcPMS JohnMcPMS deleted the no-mo-manifest branch October 9, 2023 15:53
JohnMcPMS added a commit to JohnMcPMS/winget-cli that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
This change lets the source implementation indicate whether manifests might contain more information than the search results.  It then only applies that to REST, as the implementation is not under our control.  This should have no net effect on the results quality, but should not attempt to retrieve manifests from the winget source when they are not providing any additional value currently.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants