-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trad/Simp characters marked as Simp only in Unihan_Variants.txt #88
Comments
I will post a comment in this issue once I find that character again. |
https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-table/releases/tag/1.15.0 contains “Update Unihan_Variants.txt to “2021-08-06 Unicode 14.0.0 final” and regenerate engine/chinese_variants.py” commit 4debaa5
|
Looking at the above changes coming from the new Unihan_Variants.txt, I have some doubts whether all of them are correct. For example It would be nice if somebody could go the whole list above and check. |
Yes, all the characters that you mentioned are used in Trad. I will check this list. |
I believe all of the chars from that list are used in Trad except for these two: Edit: |
Okay, I found that character. 栗 li4 is marked as Simp-only, but it's used in Taiwan. There is a city named Miaoli 苗栗 here.
|
Hi, btw, how can I try the new release on Fedora? I tried doing it the same way I did last time and nothing changed... |
Which release do you mean? |
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8a9b689712 which contains:
|
With 1.15.0, if you use cangjie5 and switch to “traditional Chinese only" mode and type |
Typing Peek.2022-01-18.07-27.mp4 |
Typing hey with cangjie5 with ibus-table-1.15.0 in traditional Chinese mode does not give 冬 anymore: Peek.2022-01-18.07-56.mp4 |
Sorry, I meant the release with your improvements regarding 顥/顯. |
We are going to fix it of course. |
That was an improvement in the cangjie5 table, so it is in the I.e. it is here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-76daebdbee |
Hm, well that's the problem. Running that dnf command doesn't do anything: $ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-76daebdbee |
Do you have ibus-table-chinese-1.8.4 already? |
I have the version I installed before through a similar command, the one with the 知/佑 improvements. This command doesn't seem to change anything. |
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8808d4f69f I updated it through this command. |
What happens if you try
before trying
|
It remade all the metadata, but then the result is still the same: dependencies resolved, nothing to do. |
Oh I just checked the version. |
|
OK, I found what happened. You have to delete
while ibus-table is not running, then restart it. This cache still has the older version of the cangjie5 table. |
This cache would have been invalidated automatically if I had increased the serial number of the cangjie5 table, but I forgot to do that when releasing 1.8.4. Like this: mike-fabian/ibus-table-chinese@95a4df5 Which will be in 1.8.6 |
Great, now everything is working as expected. Thanks! |
What do you think about the test packages for #85 ?
|
You can get this update with the commands:
|
I opened a new issue about CJK compatibility ideographs in the cangjie5 table: mike-fabian/ibus-table-chinese#1 Because an issue about these was reported for the wubi table(s): kaio#76 The user who reported the issue for the wubi tables wanted them removed because “The user can never differentiate them visually.” (That depends on the font, I guess in most cases it is right that they are very hard to distinguish or may even look completely identical). So I wanted to check whether the cangjie5 table has a similar problem. Can you please check mike-fabian/ibus-table-chinese#1 ? |
Okay |
I opened a new issue for that one: Better more issues then one issue collecting characters which can never be closed. |
37 new characters were added by updating Unihan_Variants.txt from “2021-12-01 Unicode 15.0.0 draft”: Regenerate engine/chinese_variants.py for Unihan_Variants.txt from “2021-12-01 Unicode 15.0.0 draft”
|
New issue for this part: |
New issue for this part: |
We have 3 new issues now for the remaining stuff here and can close this one. |
Gotcha! |
This is an umbrella issue that I will open (with @mike-fabian's permission, pending) to collect characters that are used in both Trad and Simp Chinese, but are marked as Simp only in Unihan_Variants.txt. Expansion of ibus/ibus#2323.
@mike-fabian I've come across another such character a couple of days ago, but I forgot to open an issue right away, so I forgot what it was. I'm sure there might be more such characters lurking around. So I suggest we keep this issue open so peeps can add such characters when/if they come across them, and you can update Unihan_Variants.txt naturally as you do maintenance on this fork.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: