Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update tap-spec to the latest version 🚀 #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2018

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jun 5, 2018

Version 5.0.0 of tap-spec was just published.

Dependency tap-spec
Current Version 4.1.2
Type devDependency

The version 5.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of tap-spec.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

  • c738478 Merge pull request #61 from scottcorgan/upgrade-lodash
  • b6b2819 Upgrade tap-out
  • 4f97ced Lock dependencies and resolve security audit warning

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 5, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6ba67c9 on greenkeeper/tap-spec-5.0.0 into bc11100 on master.

@mike182uk mike182uk merged commit 9fb3a4a into master Jun 6, 2018
@mike182uk mike182uk deleted the greenkeeper/tap-spec-5.0.0 branch June 6, 2018 08:35
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants