Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug/big int and other types in nested #89

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

miktam
Copy link
Owner

@miktam miktam commented Jul 2, 2023

Fixed #88
Refactoring.

@miktam miktam self-assigned this Jul 2, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #89 (aed6c3b) into master (4c6d530) will decrease coverage by 1.50%.
The diff coverage is 95.45%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #89      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.14%   95.65%   -1.50%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines          70       69       -1     
==========================================
- Hits           68       66       -2     
- Misses          2        3       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
indexv2.js 95.58% <95.45%> (-1.52%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@miktam miktam merged commit 8db2dbd into master Jul 3, 2023
1 check passed
@miktam miktam deleted the bug/bigInt_and_other_types_in_nested branch July 3, 2023 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] BigInt in object
2 participants