Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with Extracting Light-Kappa Chains in Dog #1600

Closed
MikolajKocikowski opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Issue with Extracting Light-Kappa Chains in Dog #1600

MikolajKocikowski opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@MikolajKocikowski
Copy link

Hi,

I've been using the imgt.202312-3.sv8.json germline database with the latest MiXCR (Oxford Nanopore preset) for extracting heavy and light chains from dog samples. While I've successfully extracted heavy and light-lambda chains, I encountered issues with light-kappa chains. Specifically, of the 10 samples, only one produced a light-kappa file, containing a minimal number of sequences (one or two), which seems like an artifact. Given that some of the sequenced samples are known to contain kappa chains, this result is unexpected.

I'm looking for the culprit behind the lack of kappa chains. Any advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

@mizraelson
Copy link
Member

Hi, can you share the align report for the sample where you expect the missing chain?

@MikolajKocikowski
Copy link
Author

MikolajKocikowski commented Mar 26, 2024

Hi! I attach two files from samples known to contain kappas among other chains. Barcode09 file produced the IGK output file with one chain, Barcode10 did not. Moderate alignment success rate is expected due to the nature of the library. Samples contain scFvs and some single chain constructs. Thanks for taking a look!

barcode09_result.align.report.txt
barcode10_result.align.report.txt

@mizraelson
Copy link
Member

I see, well the successfully aligned reads rate is rather low indeed here. Is it possible to identify a read that covers IGK from the the original FASTQ file but appears not to be aligned correctly?

@milaboratory milaboratory locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 10, 2024
@mizraelson mizraelson converted this issue into discussion #1613 Apr 10, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants