Replace bareword filehandle with lexical variable #12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bareword filehandles are no longer considered good practice. One can use a lexical variable instead to achieve the same purpose, which is the change which has been implemented here. The `open` statement also used the older two-argument form; this has been replaced with the better three-argument form.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bareword filehandles are no longer considered good practice. One can
use a lexical variable instead to achieve the same purpose, which is the
change which has been implemented here. The
openstatement also usedthe older two-argument form; this has been replaced with the better
three-argument form.