Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #342 (WIP) #350

wants to merge 1 commit into from


None yet
1 participant
Copy link

commented Apr 3, 2019

This PR come from a reverse engineering about Smart protocol where technical documentation does not notice me about a PKT-line inside a PKT-line when we compute a TCP flow. In some way, this PR should be more close to git where we merge p_http_report_status (a special case on the HTTP flow) and p_report_status (the initial case explained by technical documentation) - indeed, this is what Git does about HTTP overlay, it wraps TCP flow with an internal state to be stateless over HTTP (yes, it's ****).

I tried this with git.2.7.4 only on TCP. @hannesm could you try to test this PR with caldav over HTTP ? In my mind, it should not work ...

If it's work, I will rewrite this PR to be more clean (and remove the special case about HTTP).

Use p_report_status inside p_http_report_status to parse PKT-line ins…
…ide PKT-line and use p_http_report_status in TCP flow (wip)

@hannesm hannesm referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2019


Release 2.0 #658

3 of 7 tasks complete

@dinosaure dinosaure referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2019


Error ls remote #351


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Apr 4, 2019

Close by #351

@dinosaure dinosaure closed this Apr 4, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.