Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dtslint to 4.1.6 #989

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 1, 2021
Merged

Update dtslint to 4.1.6 #989

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 1, 2021

Conversation

IanVS
Copy link
Collaborator

@IanVS IanVS commented Oct 1, 2021

This updates the version of dtslint from 4.0.6 to 4.1.6.

It also removes the direct dependency on typescript Edit: That didn't work out, typescript does seem to still need to be installed for dtslint to run.

},
"engines": {
"node": "6.* || 8.* || >= 10.*"
},
"resolutions": {
"@definitelytyped/typescript-versions": "0.0.89"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was necessary to avoid the yarn error:

Pattern ["@definitelytyped/typescript-versions@latest"] is trying to unpack in the same destination "/Users/ianvs/Library/Caches/Yarn/v6/npm-@definitelytyped-typescript-versions-0.0.89-815ba4ec6e2e0486e0d192ba19d7359cd9610f38-integrity/node_modules/@definitelytyped/typescript-versions" as pattern ["@definitelytyped/typescript-versions@^0.0.89","@definitelytyped/typescript-versions@^0.0.89","@definitelytyped/typescript-versions@^0.0.89"]. This could result in non-deterministic behavior, skipping.

@IanVS IanVS changed the title Update dtslint [minor] Update dtslint to 4.1.6 Oct 1, 2021
@IanVS IanVS requested a review from samselikoff October 1, 2021 15:19
@IanVS IanVS merged commit 5bf840b into master Oct 1, 2021
@IanVS IanVS deleted the upgrade-typescript branch October 1, 2021 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants