-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Readme, #3038, #3041 #3042
Readme, #3038, #3041 #3042
Conversation
Because it's unmainteained
I suppose this is workable solution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's lucky, it works.
Lucky? Did you compile it successfully and test your changes or not? |
Well, you need to make a separate branch for each PR, and make one PR per branch. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once again, please compile and test your changes locally, otherwilse this PR will get closed.
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ bool CJabberProto::HandleCapsInfoRequest(const TiXmlElement *, CJabberIqInfo *pI | |||
|
|||
CJabberClientPartialCaps *pCaps = g_clientCapsManager.GetPartialCaps(JABBER_CAPS_MIRANDA_NODE, m_szFeaturesCrc); | |||
if (pCaps) { | |||
if (m_bShowOSVersion) { | |||
if (m_bShowOSVersion == true) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why that change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see how it increases code stability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is it supposed to increase code stability?
It is just unnecessary.
In general, you better don't change code formatting on pull requests.
You better focus on the actual changes..
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ bool CJabberProto::OnIqRequestVersion(const TiXmlElement*, CJabberIqInfo *pInfo) | |||
query << XCHILD("name", "Miranda NG Jabber"); | |||
query << XCHILD("version", szCoreVersion); | |||
|
|||
if (m_bShowOSVersion) { | |||
if (m_bShowOSVersion == true) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why that change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See above.
@@ -339,7 +339,8 @@ class CDlgOptAccount : public CJabberDlgBase | |||
CCtrlCombo m_cbResource; | |||
CCtrlCheck m_chkUseHostnameAsResource; | |||
CCtrlCheck m_chkUseDomainLogin; | |||
CCtrlCombo m_cbServer; | |||
CCtrlEdit m_txtServer; // "Domain/server" input | |||
CCtrlCombo m_cbServer; // Stay it here to don't get many errors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove it if it is no longer needed, and all other code that belongs to it.
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ BEGIN | |||
PUSHBUTTON "Cancel",IDCANCEL,223,207,50,14 | |||
END | |||
|
|||
// GUI in Main Menu, Accounts... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not useful to put a comment there, as Visual studio overrides it with auto-generated resource.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is right way to add comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just don't add one. I never saw one in the entire code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tweimer you comment looks like a personal opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tweimer you comment looks like a personal opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's not. Do you see any other resource file in this repository with hand written comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tweimer I asked you about argues, but you continue to ask questions to me. You joined to code review (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review).
You hold 10 strings about 2 weeks without argues about code. We did not improve Miranda, we did not know new about code. We did nothing (excluding @dartraiden who post helpful comments)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did give you an argument in the very first comment about this. It's not useful to put a comment there, as Visual studio overrides it with auto-generated resource. Also, I did give you some helpful comments on how to improve your pull request.
If you prefer to argue instead of fixing those points, I will close here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
revert this please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
m_bAllowVersionRequests has nothing to do with that
another fix is already applied
@JeanPaulLucien please separate code commits from langpack changes |
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ CJabberProto::CJabberProto(const char *aProtoName, const wchar_t *aUserName) : | |||
m_bRosterSync(this, "RosterSync", false), | |||
m_bSavePassword(this, "SavePassword", true), | |||
m_bShowForeignResourceInMirVer(this, "ShowForeignResourceInMirVer", false), | |||
m_bShowOSVersion(this, "ShowOSVersion", true), | |||
m_bShowOSVersion(this, "ShowOSVersion", false), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That change is already done in e9dd5c1
Fixed losses letters. New function for the future optimization. Some cheats to avoid errors.
Closing because:
|
There are obvious compile error which you see without even using a compiler. That just shows you did not put too much effort into your pull rerquest, It is not our job to fix your broken code. @tweimer |
While I have no idea ho to make a several PRs. You can select what to accept.