You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find low-resolution outputs image(below 128 size) looks unnatural.
According to Figure 4b, the low-resolution output should look natural too but is similar to vanilla StyleGAN2 output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, as stated in the paper, we train our models to support four resolutions from the highest: in figure 4b (ablation study), the highest resolution is 256, so the resolution range is 32-256; For the released model, the highest resolution is 1024, so the resolution range is 128-1024.
We find that resolutions below 128 are too blurry for preview, which may not be very useful.
I find low-resolution outputs image(below 128 size) looks unnatural.
According to Figure 4b, the low-resolution output should look natural too but is similar to vanilla StyleGAN2 output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: