Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ZRangeProofs #1767

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

JasonGross
Copy link
Collaborator

For #1761

On top of #1766

We make use of a slightly different abstraction relation that seems to
have better properties with reify and reflect when we don't
bottomify.

For mit-plv#1761

We make use of a slightly different abstraction relation that seems to
have better properties with `reify` and `reflect` when we don't
bottomify.
@JasonGross JasonGross marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2023 15:02
@JasonGross JasonGross merged commit 2cd94bb into mit-plv:master Dec 4, 2023
12 checks passed
@JasonGross JasonGross deleted the more-more-zrange-proofs branch December 4, 2023 15:03
JasonGross added a commit to JasonGross/fiat-crypto that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
For mit-plv#1761

We make use of a slightly different abstraction relation that seems to
have better properties with `reify` and `reflect` when we don't
bottomify.
JasonGross added a commit to JasonGross/fiat-crypto that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
For mit-plv#1761

We make use of a slightly different abstraction relation that seems to
have better properties with `reify` and `reflect` when we don't
bottomify.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant