-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue2936 #6799
Open
gellge
wants to merge
4
commits into
mitmproxy:main
Choose a base branch
from
gellge:issue2936
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Issue2936 #6799
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested this, but this looks like it will fall apart when using layouts that don't span the entire width. Can we pass in the available space instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @mhils ,
thanks for the review and the awesome work you people do here!
I'm not sure I'm following you: my (admittedly empirical) tests proved the fix to
work on layouts smaller than full screen (see attached screenshot - header values are not wrapped even if the terminal size is half that of the screen, instead the header name is wrapped at 30 chars). Are there different scenarios you're thinking of?
Furthermore, I investigated a bit more and saw that mitmproxy already uses the same way to retrieve screen columns elsewhere, for instance in mitmproxy/tools/console/statusbar.py (note that
self.master.ui
inherits fromurwid.raw_display.Screen
as it can be seen in mitmproxy/tools/console/window.py).Anyhow I am by no means an expert on
urwid
, so I'll be glad to refine the PR if you still think this approach is broken.Screenshot:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
\You can press
-
to toggle between views. If you enable the two column view,urwid.raw_display.Screen().get_cols_rows()
will give you twice the space available:The statusbar "gets away" with this by always being full width.
After looking into this for a bit, the correct fix is unfortunately more complex. Urwid widgets famously have no widths, so we'd probably need to implement a custom widget here or something like that. :/ I haven't looked super close, but it looks a bit ugly.